This is a sample. Both people are invented — Maria (11 May 1990, 08:20, Sofia) and Ivan (14 Dec 1992, 21:45, Sofia). The calculation is real, and this page is exactly what you get for 8,00 €.

Maria × Ivan

Two birth charts laid over one another, and what shows through them. Each person's birth data stays theirs — you do not see theirs and they do not see yours.

48.1 / 100

More contact than 48 out of every 100 random pairs

Roughly what two strangers picked at random would get. The middle is an answer too.

50 · random pair

0100

You both know your exact birth time. The number still moves between 36,7 and 47,6, because even a few minutes shift the Moon and the angles. That is a property of the arithmetic, not missing information — there is nothing for you to go and find.

This does not say whether things will work out. It says one thing: how unusual the contacts between the two birth charts are, compared with people picked at random. Nothing more. If you want a number that promises a future, there is none — not here and not anywhere.

By theme

emotional read

strong, and it goes easy

whether you get each other without finishing the sentences

other contacts

strong, and both ways at once

everything else that did not fit above

communication

moderate, and fairly easy

whether you talk to each other, or take turns talking

likeness

moderate, and it pulls a little

how alike you are, which helps and grates in equal parts

intensity

moderate, and both ways at once

how hard it burns — in both directions

attraction

moderate, and it goes easy

how hard the pull is, with your better judgement left out

friction

moderate, and sharp

where it rubs, and what you will argue about in the car

support

barely there, and it pulls

who puts a hand out when the day has been rough

commitment

nothing to report here

whether this sounds like a long thing or a good episode

contacts to the nodes

nothing to report here

that feeling the meeting was not entirely an accident

The numbers by theme

theme	ease	strength	contacts
emotional read	2.66	2.66	2
other contacts	0.13	2.37	10
communication	0.57	1.61	3
likeness	-0.42	1.45	4
intensity	0.09	1.33	3
attraction	1.15	1.15	1
friction	-0.89	0.89	1
support	-0.53	0.53	1
commitment	0	0	0
contacts to the nodes	0	0	0

Ease is signed: plus means soft contacts, minus means tense ones. Strength shows how pronounced the theme is, with no judgement attached.

The two other schools

24.5 out of 36 on the Indian system. It looks only at your two Moons, so it barely cares whether you know your exact hour. In India 18 and up counts as good — we just hand you the number, undressed.
12 points by Ciro Discepolo's method. He counts a few specific contacts and adds them up, like a judge marking off a list. It is here because it is published and checkable, not because it is more right than the others.

How much to trust this

Almost everything is in place — the hour wobbles a little.

индексът варира с 11 пункта (10–90%) в рамките на несигурността на часа

What we checked and what we did not

Where the planets are — checked: We check the positions against the NASA JPL ephemeris and differ by under one arcsecond. That is not an opinion, it is arithmetic.
The schools' rules — applied literally: Orbs, aspects, kutas: we apply the published rules exactly as written. The schools themselves disagree with each other — and we show that rather than papering over it.
Whether it predicts anything — we make no such claim: There is no evidence that this result predicts how a relationship will go. If anyone promises you that, they are lying to you.

How it is calculated

Each component becomes a percentile against 15 random pairs of a similar age gap, then gets weighted. The weights are measured, not chosen.

component	percentile	error
western aspects – ease	51.9	± 1.29
western aspects – strength	13.5	± 0.88
Discepolo's method	39.5	± 1.26
Indian system	68.3	± 1.2

model 1.2.0 · parameters c81888058f45438d
de440
computed 2026-11-15T15:06:28+00:00

Back to the start